CMA Dishmachines CMA-180 HTCvsEcolab E-HT
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
CMA Dishmachines CMA-180 HTC
Throughput
54racks/hr
Water Use
0.84gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.52kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Ecolab E-HT
Throughput
53racks/hr
Water Use
0.48gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.07kW
Sanitation
Dual Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Ecolab E-HT is 43% more efficient at 0.48 gal/rack versus 0.84 gal/rack for the CMA Dishmachines CMA-180 HTC. The CMA Dishmachines CMA-180 HTC is larger at 54 racks/hr versus 53 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Ecolab |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 54 | 53 |
Water Use
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Ecolab |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.84 | 0.48 |
Energy
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Ecolab |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | — | 0.07 |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.52 | 0.32 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.110 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.320 | 0.240 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Ecolab |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine | Dual Sanitizing Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |