CMA Dishmachines CMA-180-VLvsNoble Warewashing 495HTDT513
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
CMA Dishmachines CMA-180-VL
Throughput
33racks/hr
Water Use
0.82gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.1kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Noble Warewashing 495HTDT513
Throughput
31racks/hr
Water Use
0.73gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.42kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Noble Warewashing 495HTDT513 is 11% more efficient at 0.73 gal/rack versus 0.82 gal/rack for the CMA Dishmachines CMA-180-VL. The CMA Dishmachines CMA-180-VL is larger at 33 racks/hr versus 31 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Noble Warewashing |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 33 | 31 |
Water Use
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Noble Warewashing |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.82 | 0.73 |
Energy
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Noble Warewashing |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.10 | 0.42 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.15 | 0.88 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.190 | 0.280 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Noble Warewashing |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | Yes | No |
| Hot Water Offset(kWh/rack) | 0.180 | — |