CMA Dishmachines UC65evsHobart LXeH
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
CMA Dishmachines UC65e
Throughput
24racks/hr
Water Use
0.84gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.25kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Hobart LXeH
Throughput
25racks/hr
Water Use
0.74gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.19kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Hobart LXeH is 12% more efficient at 0.74 gal/rack versus 0.84 gal/rack for the CMA Dishmachines UC65e. The Hobart LXeH is larger at 25 racks/hr versus 24 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 24 | 25 |
Water Use
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.84 | 0.74 |
Energy
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.270 | 0.279 |
| Energy Saver Mode | Yes | No |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | 0.25 | — |
Configuration
| Spec | CMA Dishmachines | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |