Continental 2FNvsEverest Refrigeration EMGR48
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental 2FN
Total Volume
43.5cu ft
Daily Energy
8.51kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
52 × 32 × 77in
Everest Refrigeration EMGR48
Total Volume
43.3cu ft
Daily Energy
3.63kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
53.1 × 30.8 × 80.1in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration EMGR48 is 57% more efficient at 3.63 kWh/day versus 8.51 kWh/day for the Continental 2FN. The Continental 2FN is larger at 43.5 cu ft versus 43.3 cu ft. Overall, the Continental 2FN sits higher in the category, ranking above 96% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 77 | 80.13 |
| Width(in) | 52 | 53.13 |
| Depth(in) | 32 | 30.75 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 43.5 | 43.3 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 2 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 0 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Sliding |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 8.51 | 3.63 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Freezer | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |