Continental 2RSNvsEverest Refrigeration ESRF2A
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental 2RSN
Total Volume
36.5cu ft
Daily Energy
1.74kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
52 × 29 × 65.3in
Everest Refrigeration ESRF2A
Total Volume
36.6cu ft
Daily Energy
5.23kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
49.6 × 31.6 × 74.3in
Key differences
Continental 2RSN is 67% more efficient at 1.74 kWh/day versus 5.23 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ESRF2A. The Everest Refrigeration ESRF2A is larger at 36.6 cu ft versus 36.5 cu ft. Overall, the Everest Refrigeration ESRF2A sits higher in the category, ranking above 88% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 65.25 | 74.25 |
| Width(in) | 52 | 49.63 |
| Depth(in) | 29 | 31.63 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 36.5 | 36.6 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.74 | 5.23 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Hybrid |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |