Continental BB69NvsTraulsen RHT132NUT-FHG
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental BB69N
Total Volume
21.5cu ft
Daily Energy
1.35kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
69 × 29.2 × 34.8in
Traulsen RHT132NUT-FHG
Total Volume
21.6cu ft
Daily Energy
2.09kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
26.4 × 35 × 83.3in
Key differences
Continental BB69N is 35% more efficient at 1.35 kWh/day versus 2.09 kWh/day for the Traulsen RHT132NUT-FHG. The Traulsen RHT132NUT-FHG is larger at 21.6 cu ft versus 21.5 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 34.75 | 83.25 |
| Width(in) | 69 | 26.38 |
| Depth(in) | 29.19 | 35 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 21.5 | 21.6 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 1 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 0 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.35 | 2.09 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Traulsen |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Back Bar Cooler | Reach-in |