SpecDirectory

Continental BB79NvsTraulsen RHT132WPUT-FHG

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Continental BB79N

Total Volume

25.9cu ft

Daily Energy

1.57kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

79 × 29.2 × 34.8in

Traulsen RHT132WPUT-FHG

Total Volume

25.7cu ft

Daily Energy

2.29kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

29.9 × 37.9 × 83.3in

Key differences

Continental BB79N is 31% more efficient at 1.57 kWh/day versus 2.29 kWh/day for the Traulsen RHT132WPUT-FHG. The Continental BB79N is larger at 25.9 cu ft versus 25.7 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecContinentalTraulsen
Height(in)34.7583.25
Width(in)7929.88
Depth(in)29.1937.94

Capacity

SpecContinentalTraulsen
Total Volume(cu ft)25.925.7
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors32
Transparent Doors02
Solid Doors30
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecContinentalTraulsen
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.572.29
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecContinentalTraulsen
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecContinentalTraulsen
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Transparent Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionBack Bar CoolerPass-through

More comparisons