SpecDirectory

Continental D2RNPTvsEverest Refrigeration EMSGR48

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Continental D2RNPT

Total Volume

47.2cu ft

Daily Energy

2.41kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

46 × 27.4 × 59.3in

Everest Refrigeration EMSGR48

Total Volume

47.6cu ft

Daily Energy

3.96kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

53.1 × 32 × 80.1in

Key differences

Continental D2RNPT is 39% more efficient at 2.41 kWh/day versus 3.96 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration EMSGR48. The Everest Refrigeration EMSGR48 is larger at 47.6 cu ft versus 47.2 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Height(in)59.2580.13
Width(in)4653.13
Depth(in)27.3832

Capacity

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Total Volume(cu ft)47.247.6
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors42
Transparent Doors02
Solid Doors40
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)2.413.96
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Transparent Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionPass-throughReach-in

More comparisons