SpecDirectory

Continental D2RNPTHDvsEverest Refrigeration ESWR2

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Continental D2RNPTHD

Total Volume

46.3cu ft

Daily Energy

2.50kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

46 × 27.4 × 59.2in

Everest Refrigeration ESWR2

Total Volume

46.4cu ft

Daily Energy

3.69kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

59 × 29.5 × 74in

Key differences

Continental D2RNPTHD is 32% more efficient at 2.50 kWh/day versus 3.69 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ESWR2. The Everest Refrigeration ESWR2 is larger at 46.4 cu ft versus 46.3 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Height(in)59.2274
Width(in)4659
Depth(in)27.3829.50

Capacity

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Total Volume(cu ft)46.346.4
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors82
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors82
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)2.503.69
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionPass-throughReach-in

More comparisons