Continental D96GNvsEverest Refrigeration ETR3
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental D96GN
Total Volume
20.7cu ft
Daily Energy
1.68kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
96 × 32 × 21in
Everest Refrigeration ETR3
Total Volume
20.6cu ft
Daily Energy
1.48kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
71 × 28 × 29in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration ETR3 is 12% more efficient at 1.48 kWh/day versus 1.68 kWh/day for the Continental D96GN. The Continental D96GN is larger at 20.7 cu ft versus 20.6 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 21 | 29 |
| Width(in) | 96 | 71 |
| Depth(in) | 32 | 28 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 20.7 | 20.6 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 0 | 3 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 0 | 3 |
| Drawers | 4 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Drawer | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.68 | 1.48 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Chef Base Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Chest | Vertical |
| Description | Chef Base | Reach-in |