Continental DL2WI-SA-RTvsTurbo Air PRO-77-6H
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Continental DL2WI-SA-RT
Internal Volume
64.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
448W
Energy Usage
422W
Doors
4
Turbo Air PRO-77-6H
Internal Volume
73cu ft
Max Idle Rate
482W
Energy Usage
282W
Doors
6
Key differences
Continental DL2WI-SA-RT is 7% more efficient at 448 W versus 482 W for the Turbo Air PRO-77-6H. The Turbo Air PRO-77-6H is larger at 73 cu ft versus 64.2 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 64.2 | 73 |
| Doors | 4 | 6 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Continental | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 422 | 282 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 448 | 482 |