Alto-Shaam BQ-128vsContinental DL2WI-SA-RT
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam BQ-128
Internal Volume
55.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
294W
Energy Usage
294W
Doors
1
Continental DL2WI-SA-RT
Internal Volume
64.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
448W
Energy Usage
422W
Doors
4
Key differences
Alto-Shaam BQ-128 is 34% more efficient at 294 W versus 448 W for the Continental DL2WI-SA-RT. The Continental DL2WI-SA-RT is larger at 64.2 cu ft versus 55.9 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 55.9 | 64.2 |
| Doors | 1 | 4 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 294 | 422 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 294 | 448 |