SpecDirectory

Continental MC3NSvsEverest Refrigeration EBB48-24

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Continental MC3NS

Total Volume

12.6cu ft

Daily Energy

0.87kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

34 × 33.9 × 42in

Everest Refrigeration EBB48-24

Total Volume

12.7cu ft

Daily Energy

1.14kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

49 × 24.5 × 37.3in

Key differences

Continental MC3NS is 24% more efficient at 0.87 kWh/day versus 1.14 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration EBB48-24. The Everest Refrigeration EBB48-24 is larger at 12.7 cu ft versus 12.6 cu ft. Overall, the Everest Refrigeration EBB48-24 sits higher in the category, ranking above 30% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.

Dimensions

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Height(in)4237.25
Width(in)3449
Depth(in)33.8824.50

Capacity

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Total Volume(cu ft)12.612.7
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors12
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors12
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)0.871.14
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionMilk CoolerBack Bar Cooler

More comparisons