Continental RA60SNvsEverest Refrigeration ETBWR2
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental RA60SN
Total Volume
15.1cu ft
Daily Energy
0.95kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
60 × 26 × 35in
Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2
Total Volume
15.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.21kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
59 × 28 × 22in
Key differences
Continental RA60SN is 21% more efficient at 0.95 kWh/day versus 1.21 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2. The Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2 is larger at 15.3 cu ft versus 15.1 cu ft. Overall, the Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2 sits higher in the category, ranking above 36% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 35 | 22 |
| Width(in) | 60 | 59 |
| Depth(in) | 26 | 28 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 15.1 | 15.3 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 0.95 | 1.21 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |