Continental SW36NvsEverest Refrigeration ETR2-24
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Continental SW36N
Total Volume
8.3cu ft
Daily Energy
0.81kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
36 × 31.6 × 35.3in
Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24
Total Volume
8.4cu ft
Daily Energy
1.02kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
21 × 29 × 47in
Key differences
Continental SW36N is 21% more efficient at 0.81 kWh/day versus 1.02 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24. The Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24 is larger at 8.4 cu ft versus 8.3 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 35.25 | 47 |
| Width(in) | 36 | 21 |
| Depth(in) | 31.56 | 29 |
Capacity
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 0.81 | 1.02 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Continental | Everest Refrigeration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Under-counter Unit | Reach-in |