EMPURA E-UCH240vsHoshizaki IM-200BAK
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
EMPURA E-UCH240
Harvest Rate
148lb/day
Energy Use
7.15kWh/100 lb
Water Use
17.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki IM-200BAK
Harvest Rate
150lb/day
Energy Use
6.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
23gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Hoshizaki IM-200BAK is 9% more efficient at 6.50 kWh/100 lb versus 7.15 kWh/100 lb for the EMPURA E-UCH240. The Hoshizaki IM-200BAK is larger at 150 lb/day versus 148 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | EMPURA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 148 | 150 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 0 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | EMPURA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 7.15 | 6.50 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 17.1 | 23 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | EMPURA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | EMPURA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |