SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration EBB69vsTurbo Air TMKC-58-2-*S-N6

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration EBB69

Total Volume

21.9cu ft

Daily Energy

1.39kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

68 × 27 × 37.3in

Turbo Air TMKC-58-2-*S-N6

Total Volume

22cu ft

Daily Energy

1.07kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-600a

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

58 × 33 × 36in

Key differences

Turbo Air TMKC-58-2-*S-N6 is 23% more efficient at 1.07 kWh/day versus 1.39 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration EBB69. The Turbo Air TMKC-58-2-*S-N6 is larger at 22 cu ft versus 21.9 cu ft. Turbo Air TMKC-58-2-*S-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Height(in)37.2536
Width(in)6858
Depth(in)2733

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Total Volume(cu ft)21.922
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors24
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors24
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.391.07
Defrost TypeAutomaticManual

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
TypeR-290R-600a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorHorizontal Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalChest
DescriptionReach-inMilk Cooler

More comparisons