SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration EBNR2vsTurbo Air TGM-35SDH*-N

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration EBNR2

Total Volume

31.6cu ft

Daily Energy

2.03kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

39.4 × 33.1 × 77in

Turbo Air TGM-35SDH*-N

Total Volume

31.7cu ft

Daily Energy

2.26kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

40 × 32 × 77in

Key differences

Everest Refrigeration EBNR2 is 10% more efficient at 2.03 kWh/day versus 2.26 kWh/day for the Turbo Air TGM-35SDH*-N. The Turbo Air TGM-35SDH*-N is larger at 31.7 cu ft versus 31.6 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Height(in)7777
Width(in)39.3840
Depth(in)33.1332

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Total Volume(cu ft)31.631.7
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors22
Transparent Doors02
Solid Doors20
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)2.032.26
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Transparent Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons