Everest Refrigeration EBR2vsTurbo Air TGM-50RS*-N
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration EBR2
Total Volume
45.8cu ft
Daily Energy
2.74kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
33.1 × 77 × 54.1in
Turbo Air TGM-50RS*-N
Total Volume
46cu ft
Daily Energy
3.15kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
56 × 33 × 78in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration EBR2 is 13% more efficient at 2.74 kWh/day versus 3.15 kWh/day for the Turbo Air TGM-50RS*-N. The Turbo Air TGM-50RS*-N is larger at 46 cu ft versus 45.8 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 54.13 | 78 |
| Width(in) | 33.13 | 56 |
| Depth(in) | 77 | 33 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 45.8 | 46 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 2 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 0 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 2.74 | 3.15 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |