SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ESRF3vsFogel CR-65-HC-US

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ESRF3

Total Volume

56.9cu ft

Daily Energy

6.17kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

74.8 × 31.7 × 74.3in

Fogel CR-65-HC-US

Total Volume

56cu ft

Daily Energy

4.56kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

78 × 29.5 × 78in

Key differences

Fogel CR-65-HC-US is 26% more efficient at 4.56 kWh/day versus 6.17 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ESRF3. The Everest Refrigeration ESRF3 is larger at 56.9 cu ft versus 56 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationFogel
Height(in)74.3078
Width(in)74.8078
Depth(in)31.7029.50

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationFogel
Total Volume(cu ft)56.956
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors33
Transparent Doors03
Solid Doors30
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationFogel
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)6.174.56
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationFogel
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationFogel
Product TypeVertical Solid Door HybridVertical Transparent Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons