Everest Refrigeration ETBR2vsQBD CD12-HC
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBR2
Total Volume
11.7cu ft
Daily Energy
1.11kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
47.5 × 31.5 × 30.3in
QBD CD12-HC
Total Volume
11.6cu ft
Daily Energy
1.36kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
24.9 × 24.5 × 62in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration ETBR2 is 18% more efficient at 1.11 kWh/day versus 1.36 kWh/day for the QBD CD12-HC. The Everest Refrigeration ETBR2 is larger at 11.7 cu ft versus 11.6 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 30.25 | 62 |
| Width(in) | 47.50 | 24.88 |
| Depth(in) | 31.50 | 24.50 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 11.7 | 11.6 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 1 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 0 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.11 | 1.36 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Under-counter Unit | Reach-in |