Everest Refrigeration ETWR2vsQBD CD4154-HC
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETWR2
Total Volume
16.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.27kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
29.3 × 59.3 × 31.3in
QBD CD4154-HC
Total Volume
16.4cu ft
Daily Energy
1.86kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
55.9 × 47 × 21in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration ETWR2 is 32% more efficient at 1.27 kWh/day versus 1.86 kWh/day for the QBD CD4154-HC. The QBD CD4154-HC is larger at 16.4 cu ft versus 16.3 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 31.25 | 21 |
| Width(in) | 29.25 | 55.88 |
| Depth(in) | 59.25 | 47 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 16.3 | 16.4 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 2 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 0 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Sliding |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.27 | 1.86 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | QBD |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Under-counter Unit | Reach-in |