Fagor CO-400WvsMeiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30 Heat Recovery
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Fagor CO-400W
Throughput
17racks/hr
Water Use
0.65gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.25kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30 Heat Recovery
Throughput
14racks/hr
Water Use
0.82gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.22kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Fagor CO-400W is 21% more efficient at 0.65 gal/rack versus 0.82 gal/rack for the Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30 Heat Recovery. The Fagor CO-400W is larger at 17 racks/hr versus 14 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | Fagor | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 17 | 14 |
Water Use
| Spec | Fagor | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.65 | 0.82 |
Energy
| Spec | Fagor | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.120 | 0.120 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.22 |
Configuration
| Spec | Fagor | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | — | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | Yes |
| Heat Recovery Features | — | Exhaust Heat Exchanger |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | Yes |
| Hot Water Offset(kWh/rack) | — | 0.180 |