Follett C1014AvsManitowoc IDP1000A-261
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett C1014A
Harvest Rate
802lb/day
Energy Use
4.35kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Manitowoc IDP1000A-261
Harvest Rate
790lb/day
Energy Use
4.65kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.9gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Follett C1014A is 6% more efficient at 4.35 kWh/100 lb versus 4.65 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IDP1000A-261. The Follett C1014A is larger at 802 lb/day versus 790 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 802 | 790 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 89.30 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.35 | 4.65 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 13.9 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |