Follett HCD710ABTvsManitowoc IDT0750N-261
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett HCD710ABT
Harvest Rate
586lb/day
Energy Use
4.78kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Manitowoc IDT0750N-261
Harvest Rate
580lb/day
Energy Use
5.38kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Follett HCD710ABT is 11% more efficient at 4.78 kWh/100 lb versus 5.38 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IDT0750N-261. The Follett HCD710ABT is larger at 586 lb/day versus 580 lb/day. Manitowoc IDT0750N-261 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 586 | 580 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 89.70 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.78 | 5.38 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 20 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | — | JCT1200-261 |