Follett HCF2110RvsManitowoc IDT1900N-261E
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett HCF2110R
Harvest Rate
1632lb/day
Energy Use
3.21kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Manitowoc IDT1900N-261E
Harvest Rate
1643lb/day
Energy Use
4.02kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Follett HCF2110R is 20% more efficient at 3.21 kWh/100 lb versus 4.02 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IDT1900N-261E. The Manitowoc IDT1900N-261E is larger at 1643 lb/day versus 1632 lb/day. Manitowoc IDT1900N-261E uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1632 | 1643 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 89.06 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.21 | 4.02 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 20 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | MHHZ0353C | JCT1500-261 |