Follett IM-0465-ACvsManitowoc UFP0350A-161
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett IM-0465-AC
Harvest Rate
323lb/day
Energy Use
5.22kWh/100 lb
Water Use
16.2gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Manitowoc UFP0350A-161
Harvest Rate
321lb/day
Energy Use
6.10kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Follett IM-0465-AC is 14% more efficient at 5.22 kWh/100 lb versus 6.10 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc UFP0350A-161. The Follett IM-0465-AC is larger at 323 lb/day versus 321 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 323 | 321 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Continuous |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 71 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.22 | 6.10 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 16.2 | 12 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |