Follett UFD414A80vsHoshizaki KM-350MAJ
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett UFD414A80
Harvest Rate
394lb/day
Energy Use
5.27kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki KM-350MAJ
Harvest Rate
393lb/day
Energy Use
5.42kWh/100 lb
Water Use
14.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Key differences
Follett UFD414A80 is 3% more efficient at 5.27 kWh/100 lb versus 5.42 kWh/100 lb for the Hoshizaki KM-350MAJ. The Follett UFD414A80 is larger at 394 lb/day versus 393 lb/day. Follett UFD414A80 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 394 | 393 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 48 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.27 | 5.42 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 14.5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-404A |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-404A (GWP:3920) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |