Follett UMD414A80vsKoolaire KYT0420A-261
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett UMD414A80
Harvest Rate
359lb/day
Energy Use
5.85kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Koolaire KYT0420A-261
Harvest Rate
360lb/day
Energy Use
5.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Koolaire KYT0420A-261 is 6% more efficient at 5.50 kWh/100 lb versus 5.85 kWh/100 lb for the Follett UMD414A80. The Koolaire KYT0420A-261 is larger at 360 lb/day versus 359 lb/day. Follett UMD414A80 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus Other, R410A (GWP 2088).
Production
| Spec | Follett | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 359 | 360 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 88.90 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.85 | 5.50 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 19 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |