Garland MG-3PXvsTaylor Company C842-28
Side-by-side griddle comparison
Garland MG-3PX
Cooking Surface
5.6sq ft
Production
70lb/hr
Cooking Efficiency
48%
Fuel
Gas
Taylor Company C842-28
Cooking Surface
6sq ft
Production
90lb/hr
Cooking Efficiency
80%
Fuel
Electric
Key differences
Taylor Company C842-28 is 40% more efficient at 80.0 % versus 48.0 % for the Garland MG-3PX. The Taylor Company C842-28 is larger at 6 sq ft versus 5.6 sq ft.
Cooking Surface
| Spec | Garland | Taylor Company |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Area(sq ft) | 5.6 | 6 |
| Width(ft) | 3.10 | 3 |
| Depth(ft) | 1.80 | 2 |
| Plate Type | Polished Steel | Steel T-1 |
Performance
| Spec | Garland | Taylor Company |
|---|---|---|
| Production Capacity(lb/hr) | 70 | 90 |
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 48 | 80 |
| Idle Rate(BTU/hr/ft²) | 1724 | — |
Configuration
| Spec | Garland | Taylor Company |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Double-Sided | Double-Sided |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Tested Configuration | Double-Sided | Double-Sided |