Hobart CDLvsMeiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-20 Heat Recovery
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Hobart CDL
Throughput
13racks/hr
Water Use
0.85gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.24kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-20 Heat Recovery
Throughput
14racks/hr
Water Use
0.82gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.22kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-20 Heat Recovery is 4% more efficient at 0.82 gal/rack versus 0.85 gal/rack for the Hobart CDL. The Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-20 Heat Recovery is larger at 14 racks/hr versus 13 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 13 | 14 |
Water Use
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.85 | 0.82 |
Energy
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.24 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.22 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.10 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.140 | 0.120 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.22 |
Configuration
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | — | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | Yes |
| Heat Recovery Features | — | Exhaust Heat Exchanger |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | Yes |
| Hot Water Offset(kWh/rack) | — | 0.180 |