Hobart EULvsMeiko USA, Inc. M004DWHT10M1-20
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Hobart EUL
Water Use
0.88gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.06kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Under Counter - Glasswasher
Meiko USA, Inc. M004DWHT10M1-20
Throughput
56racks/hr
Water Use
0.75gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.25kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Meiko USA, Inc. M004DWHT10M1-20 is 15% more efficient at 0.75 gal/rack versus 0.88 gal/rack for the Hobart EUL.
Throughput
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | — | 56 |
Water Use
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.88 | 0.75 |
Energy
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.06 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.25 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.15 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.110 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.260 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | — | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |