Hobart LXGnPRvsMeiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Hobart LXGnPR
Throughput
29racks/hr
Water Use
1.14gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.07kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30
Throughput
28racks/hr
Water Use
0.64gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.29kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Meiko USA, Inc. M007DWUC10M3-30 is 44% more efficient at 0.64 gal/rack versus 1.14 gal/rack for the Hobart LXGnPR. The Hobart LXGnPR is larger at 29 racks/hr versus 28 racks/hr. Overall, the Hobart LXGnPR sits higher in the category, ranking above 93% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 29 | 28 |
Water Use
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.14 | 0.64 |
Energy
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.07 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.29 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.09 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.070 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.190 |
| Energy Saver Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | 0.08 | 0.29 |
Configuration
| Spec | Hobart | Meiko USA, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | Yes | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |