Hobart LXnCvsStero SG
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Hobart LXnC
Throughput
27racks/hr
Water Use
0.62gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.14kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Stero SG
Throughput
26racks/hr
Water Use
1.14gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.08kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Hobart LXnC is 46% more efficient at 0.62 gal/rack versus 1.14 gal/rack for the Stero SG. The Hobart LXnC is larger at 27 racks/hr versus 26 racks/hr. Overall, the Stero SG sits higher in the category, ranking above 93% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 27 | 26 |
Water Use
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.62 | 1.14 |
Energy
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.14 | 0.08 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.090 | 0.080 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.08 |
Configuration
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |