Hobart LXnHvsStero SUL
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Hobart LXnH
Throughput
26racks/hr
Water Use
0.62gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.19kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Stero SUL
Throughput
25racks/hr
Water Use
0.74gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.15kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Hobart LXnH is 16% more efficient at 0.62 gal/rack versus 0.74 gal/rack for the Stero SUL. The Hobart LXnH is larger at 26 racks/hr versus 25 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 26 | 25 |
Water Use
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.62 | 0.74 |
Energy
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | — | 0.15 |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.19 | — |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.09 | — |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.090 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.280 | — |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Hobart | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |