Hoshizaki KM-1301SRJZ3vsICETRO IM-1700-AC
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-1301SRJZ3
Harvest Rate
1330lb/day
Energy Use
3.83kWh/100 lb
Water Use
14gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
ICETRO IM-1700-AC
Harvest Rate
1352lb/day
Energy Use
4.19kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.6gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-1301SRJZ3 is 9% more efficient at 3.83 kWh/100 lb versus 4.19 kWh/100 lb for the ICETRO IM-1700-AC. The ICETRO IM-1700-AC is larger at 1352 lb/day versus 1330 lb/day. ICETRO IM-1700-AC uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R-410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1330 | 1352 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.83 | 4.19 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 14 | 13.6 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R-410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | URC-14FZ | — |