Hoshizaki KM-420MRJZvsManitowoc IYT0620A-161
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-420MRJZ
Harvest Rate
460lb/day
Energy Use
5kWh/100 lb
Water Use
16gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Manitowoc IYT0620A-161
Harvest Rate
465lb/day
Energy Use
4.87kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19.9gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Manitowoc IYT0620A-161 is 3% more efficient at 4.87 kWh/100 lb versus 5.00 kWh/100 lb for the Hoshizaki KM-420MRJZ. The Manitowoc IYT0620A-161 is larger at 465 lb/day versus 460 lb/day. Manitowoc IYT0620A-161 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 460 | 465 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5 | 4.87 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 16 | 19.9 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | URC-5FZ | — |