Hoshizaki KM-522MAKvsIce-O-Matic CIM0636HAT
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-522MAK
Harvest Rate
445lb/day
Energy Use
5.15kWh/100 lb
Water Use
17gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Ice-O-Matic CIM0636HAT
Harvest Rate
440lb/day
Energy Use
5.45kWh/100 lb
Water Use
18.6gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-522MAK is 6% more efficient at 5.15 kWh/100 lb versus 5.45 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic CIM0636HAT. The Hoshizaki KM-522MAK is larger at 445 lb/day versus 440 lb/day. Hoshizaki KM-522MAK uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 445 | 440 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.15 | 5.45 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 17 | 18.6 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-404A |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-404A (GWP:3920) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |