Ice-O-Matic CIM0530HAT*SvsManitowoc IYT0500A-161
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Ice-O-Matic CIM0530HAT*S
Harvest Rate
420lb/day
Energy Use
5.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19.9gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Manitowoc IYT0500A-161
Harvest Rate
421lb/day
Energy Use
5.05kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19.9gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Manitowoc IYT0500A-161 is 8% more efficient at 5.05 kWh/100 lb versus 5.50 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic CIM0530HAT*S. The Manitowoc IYT0500A-161 is larger at 421 lb/day versus 420 lb/day. Manitowoc IYT0500A-161 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 420 | 421 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.50 | 5.05 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 19.9 | 19.9 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |