Ice-O-Matic CIMU220*A90vsManitowoc UYP0190A-161BX
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Ice-O-Matic CIMU220*A90
Harvest Rate
167lb/day
Energy Use
5.82kWh/100 lb
Water Use
22.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Manitowoc UYP0190A-161BX
Harvest Rate
169lb/day
Energy Use
6.36kWh/100 lb
Water Use
15.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Ice-O-Matic CIMU220*A90 is 8% more efficient at 5.82 kWh/100 lb versus 6.36 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc UYP0190A-161BX. The Manitowoc UYP0190A-161BX is larger at 169 lb/day versus 167 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 167 | 169 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.82 | 6.36 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 22.5 | 15.5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | — | 2 |