SpecDirectory

Ice-O-Matic HEM0956A90vsManitowoc IYT0750N-261

Side-by-side ice machine comparison

Ice-O-Matic HEM0956A90

Harvest Rate

620lb/day

Energy Use

4.69kWh/100 lb

Water Use

12gal/100 lb

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower

Manitowoc IYT0750N-261

Harvest Rate

619lb/day

Energy Use

5.26kWh/100 lb

Water Use

20gal/100 lb

Refrigerant

Other, R410A

GWP 2088 · Higher

Key differences

Ice-O-Matic HEM0956A90 is 11% more efficient at 4.69 kWh/100 lb versus 5.26 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IYT0750N-261. The Ice-O-Matic HEM0956A90 is larger at 620 lb/day versus 619 lb/day. Ice-O-Matic HEM0956A90 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus Other, R410A (GWP 2088). Overall, the Manitowoc IYT0750N-261 sits higher in the category, ranking above 82% of certified commercial ice machines.

Production

SpecIce-O-MaticManitowoc
Harvest Rate(lb/day)620619
Ice TypeContinuousBatch
Equipment TypeIce Making HeadRemote Condensing Unit
Ice Hardness Factor85100

Efficiency

SpecIce-O-MaticManitowoc
Energy Use(kWh/100 lb)4.695.26
Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb)1220

Refrigerant

SpecIce-O-MaticManitowoc
TypeR-290Other, R410A
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-410A (GWP:2088)

Connectivity

SpecIce-O-MaticManitowoc
ConnectedNoNo
Condenser Model—JCT1200-261

More comparisons