Ice-O-Matic MFI2306RvsICETRO IM-2000-RC
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Ice-O-Matic MFI2306R
Harvest Rate
1845lb/day
Energy Use
4.05kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
ICETRO IM-2000-RC
Harvest Rate
1861lb/day
Energy Use
3.65kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
ICETRO IM-2000-RC is 10% more efficient at 3.65 kWh/100 lb versus 4.05 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic MFI2306R. The ICETRO IM-2000-RC is larger at 1861 lb/day versus 1845 lb/day. ICETRO IM-2000-RC uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R-410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1845 | 1861 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 66 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.05 | 3.65 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 13.5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R-410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | RCA2061 | ICR-2000 |