ICETRO IM-0355-ACvsManitowoc UYP0310A-161B
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ICETRO IM-0355-AC
Harvest Rate
266lb/day
Energy Use
5.59kWh/100 lb
Water Use
16.6gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Manitowoc UYP0310A-161B
Harvest Rate
270lb/day
Energy Use
5.85kWh/100 lb
Water Use
15.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
ICETRO IM-0355-AC is 4% more efficient at 5.59 kWh/100 lb versus 5.85 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc UYP0310A-161B. The Manitowoc UYP0310A-161B is larger at 270 lb/day versus 266 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 266 | 270 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.59 | 5.85 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 16.6 | 15.5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | — | 3 |