ICETRO IM-2000-ACvsManitowoc IYT1900N-261E
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ICETRO IM-2000-AC
Harvest Rate
1702lb/day
Energy Use
4.07kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E
Harvest Rate
1744lb/day
Energy Use
4kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on energy: 4.07 vs 4.00 kWh/100 lb. The Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E is larger at 1744 lb/day versus 1702 lb/day. Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus Other, R-410A (GWP 2088).
Production
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1702 | 1744 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.07 | 4 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 13 | 20 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Other, R-410A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-410A (GWP:2088) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | — | JCT1500-261 |