Jackson Conserver XL-E-LTHvsJackson DynaStar HH-E-VER
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Jackson Conserver XL-E-LTH
Throughput
37racks/hr
Water Use
1.03gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.14kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Jackson DynaStar HH-E-VER
Throughput
38racks/hr
Water Use
0.72gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.36kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Jackson DynaStar HH-E-VER is 30% more efficient at 0.72 gal/rack versus 1.03 gal/rack for the Jackson Conserver XL-E-LTH. The Jackson DynaStar HH-E-VER is larger at 38 racks/hr versus 37 racks/hr. Overall, the Jackson Conserver XL-E-LTH sits higher in the category, ranking above 88% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Jackson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 37 | 38 |
| Wash Area(sq ft) | — | 2.7 |
Water Use
| Spec | Jackson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.03 | 0.72 |
Energy
| Spec | Jackson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.14 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.36 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.14 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.150 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.200 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Jackson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | Yes |
| Heat Recovery Features | — | Exhaust Heat ExchangerExhaust Heat Exchanger |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | Yes |
| Hot Water Offset(kWh/rack) | — | 0.160 |