Manitowoc UNP0200A-161vsScotsman UC2024SA-1A
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Manitowoc UNP0200A-161
Harvest Rate
164lb/day
Energy Use
7.30kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Scotsman UC2024SA-1A
Harvest Rate
166lb/day
Energy Use
6.27kWh/100 lb
Water Use
22.4gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Key differences
Scotsman UC2024SA-1A is 14% more efficient at 6.27 kWh/100 lb versus 7.30 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc UNP0200A-161. The Scotsman UC2024SA-1A is larger at 166 lb/day versus 164 lb/day. Manitowoc UNP0200A-161 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).
Production
| Spec | Manitowoc | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 164 | 166 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 84 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Manitowoc | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 7.30 | 6.27 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 22.4 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Manitowoc | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Manitowoc | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |