osion BK-100vsScotsman CU2026MA-1E
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
osion BK-100
Harvest Rate
144lb/day
Energy Use
6.44kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Scotsman CU2026MA-1E
Harvest Rate
145lb/day
Energy Use
7.23kWh/100 lb
Water Use
21gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Key differences
osion BK-100 is 11% more efficient at 6.44 kWh/100 lb versus 7.23 kWh/100 lb for the Scotsman CU2026MA-1E. The Scotsman CU2026MA-1E is larger at 145 lb/day versus 144 lb/day. osion BK-100 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).
Production
| Spec | osion | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 144 | 145 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 99.98 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | osion | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 6.44 | 7.23 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 21 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | osion | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |
Connectivity
| Spec | osion | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |