SpecDirectory

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSSvsKenmore KMR31TBKE

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS

Capacity

3.1cu ft

Annual Energy

270kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

25%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

18.5 × 33in (w × h)

Kenmore KMR31TBKE

Capacity

3cu ft

Annual Energy

320kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

11%

Dimensions

18.8 × 32.7in (w × h)

Key differences

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS is 16% more efficient at 270 kWh/yr versus 320 kWh/yr for the Kenmore KMR31TBKE. The APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
Total Volume(cu ft)3.13
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)3.83.8

Dimensions

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
Height(in)3332.7
Width(in)18.518.8

Energy

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)270320
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)358358
Better Than Standard(%)2511
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
TypeCompact RefrigeratorCompact Refrigerator
Product Class12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactYesYes
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSKenmore
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons