SpecDirectory

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSSvsMicroFridge 3.0MF4R

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS

Capacity

3.1cu ft

Annual Energy

270kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

25%

Well above minimum
Dimensions

18.5 × 33in (w × h)

MicroFridge 3.0MF4R

Capacity

3cu ft

Annual Energy

319kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

11%

Dimensions

18.6 × 33.3in (w × h)

Key differences

APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS is 15% more efficient at 270 kWh/yr versus 319 kWh/yr for the MicroFridge 3.0MF4R. The APPLIANCE BASICS CR31TABDDSS is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
Total Volume(cu ft)3.13
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)3.83.6

Dimensions

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
Height(in)3333.3
Width(in)18.518.6

Energy

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)270319
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)358357
Better Than Standard(%)2511
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
TypeCompact RefrigeratorCompact Refrigerator
Product Class12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost12 - Compact Refrigerator-Freezer - partial automatic defrost
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactYesYes
Ice MakerNoNo
Through-the-Door DispenserNoNo

Refrigerant

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecAPPLIANCE BASICSMicroFridge
ConnectedNoNo

More comparisons