Asko T3HW.UvsFisher&Paykel DE4024P2
Side-by-side dryer comparison
Asko T3HW.U
Drum Capacity
4.2cu ft
CEF
6lb/kWh
Annual Energy
142kWh/yr
Type
Electric
Fisher&Paykel DE4024P2
Drum Capacity
4.1cu ft
CEF
2.68lb/kWh
Annual Energy
317kWh/yr
Type
Electric
Key differences
Asko T3HW.U is 55% more efficient at 6.00 lb/kWh versus 2.68 lb/kWh for the Fisher&Paykel DE4024P2. The Asko T3HW.U is larger at 4.2 cu ft versus 4.1 cu ft. Overall, the Asko T3HW.U sits higher in the category, ranking above 92% of certified clothes dryers.
Capacity
| Spec | Asko | Fisher&Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Drum Capacity(cu ft) | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Dimensions
| Spec | Asko | Fisher&Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Width(in) | 23.5 | 23.6 |
| Height(in) | 33.5 | 33.5 |
| Depth(in) | 24.8 | 25.4 |
Energy
| Spec | Asko | Fisher&Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Energy Factor(lb/kWh) | 6 | 2.68 |
| Estimated Annual Energy(kWh/yr) | 142 | 317 |
| Test Cycle Time(min) | 53 | 29 |
| Test Cycle | Normal, medium dryness level, maximum drying temperature | COTTON |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Asko | Fisher&Paykel |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Electric Compact Ventless 240V | Electric Compact Ventless 240V |
| Type | Electric | Electric |
| Vented or Ventless | Ventless | Ventless |
| Connected | No | No |
| Additional Features | Filter cleaning indicator, Drum light, Time remaining display, Wrinkle prevention option | Wrinkle prevention option |